Operation Epic Fury experienced its first official pause via an announced two-week ceasefire entered into by the U.S., Israel, and Iran less than 90 minutes before President Trump’s 8:00 p.m. Tuesday deadline. Markets reacted favorably, with oil falling more than 16% on Wednesday. For the week, the S&P 500 finished up 3.68%—its best week since November. WTI settled on Friday at $98.46 per barrel and Brent at $96.75, sustaining last week’s benchmark inversion.
The ceasefire is real, though its structural ambiguities are testing its durability. Within 12 hours, Israel launched its largest coordinated strike on Lebanon since the war began. Iran immediately protested and re-closed the Strait of Hormuz. Iran’s parliament speaker declared three clauses of the ceasefire framework had been violated before this weekend’s planned “Islamabad Talks” had even begun.
The week’s domestic political story was equally extraordinary. President Trump’s Tuesday morning Truth Social post—“A whole civilization will die tonight, never to be brought back again”—triggered a 25th Amendment coalition spanning Democrats and far-right isolationists alike. The calls will go nowhere, but a vote in the House next week on another war powers resolution could demonstrate shifting congressional sentiment with two critical congressional actions looming: affirming a potential peace agreement and approving supplemental appropriations for the war effort.
Despite the markets’ initial positive reaction to the ceasefire, this week’s economic data was sobering. The March CPI came in at 3.3% annually—the hottest reading of the second Trump Administration—with a 0.9% monthly surge driven by a 21% gasoline spike.
On the trade front, USTR Ambassador Jamieson Greer publicly acknowledged the reality that full USMCA resolution by the July 1 Joint Review deadline is unlikely. Meanwhile, the upcoming Trump-Xi summit in mid-May was framed by Greer as ensuring a stable relationship and continued U.S. access to rare earths. Finally, the U.S.-Hungary bilateral package and ConocoPhillips deploying a team to Venezuela demonstrated continued Trump Administration trade agenda momentum despite the ongoing Iran conflict and the destabilized global economy.
GEOPOLITICAL UPDATE
Ceasefire
The ceasefire announcement arrived through three simultaneous posts on the evening of April 7. Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif posted: “With the greatest humility, I am pleased to announce that the Islamic Republic of Iran and the United States of America, along with their allies, have agreed to an immediate ceasefire everywhere including Lebanon and elsewhere, EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY.” Trump posted that he was suspending the bombing based on conversations with Sharif and Pakistan’s Field Marshal Asim Munir, conditioned on Iran’s “COMPLETE, IMMEDIATE, and SAFE OPENING of the Strait of Hormuz.” Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi also confirmed, stating safe passage through the Strait would be possible “via coordination with Iran’s Armed Forces and with due consideration of technical limitations.” Trump separately characterized Iran’s 10-point proposal as “a workable basis on which to negotiate” and said “almost all of the various points of past contention have been agreed to.”
In a post just after midnight, Trump added: “Big day for World Peace! Iran wants it to happen, they’ve had enough! Big money will be made. Iran can start the reconstruction process. We’ll be loading up with supplies of all kinds, and just ‘hangin’ around’ in order to make sure that everything goes well. This could be the Golden Age of the Middle East!!!” The midnight post also contained a more substantive disclosure. Trump stated there would be “no enrichment of Uranium,” that the U.S. would work with Iran to “dig up and remove” nuclear material, and that “tariff and sanctions relief” was under discussion—the first public U.S. acknowledgment that sanctions relief is on the table.
The behind-the-scenes picture from Axios purported that U.S. forces in the Middle East and Pentagon officials had no idea what was going to happen and that preparations for a massive bombing campaign continued right up until Trump announced the ceasefire. The breakthrough didn’t finally occur until Iranian Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei gave negotiators his blessing to cut a deal.
In the hours following the announcement, media outlets focused on the origins of the Sharif post, which was initially published “Draft—Pakistan’s PM Message on X.” This has fueled speculation the announcement had been scripted by the Trump Administration. The President later told AFP he believed China had helped get Iran to the table: “I hear yes. Yes they were.” The White House confirmed Beijing’s role took place at the “top levels” of both governments.
Both sides claimed victory. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt stated: “This is a victory for the United States that President Trump and our incredible military made happen. From the very beginning of Operation Epic Fury, President Trump estimated this would be a 4-to-6-week operation.” The ceasefire landed on the outer edge of that timeline. Iran’s Supreme National Security Council, on the other hand, declared “the enemy has suffered an undeniable, historic and crushing defeat.”
The ceasefire text, however, has three unresolved fault lines, each of which could collapse the détente as the Islamabad Talks begin today. The most immediate disagreement involves ongoing Israeli operations in Lebanon.
Israel launched its largest coordinated strike on the country—100 targets in 10 minutes—within hours of the ceasefire announcement, killing at least 112 people. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said the ceasefire did not cover Lebanon, which Trump confirmed, calling Israel’s campaign a “separate skirmish.” A senior U.S. official confirmed Trump and Netanyahu agreed in a pre-announcement phone call that Lebanon could continue—a deliberate carve-out, not a drafting oversight.
Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi quickly countered, saying “The U.S. must choose—ceasefire or continued war via Israel. It cannot have both. The world sees the massacres in Lebanon. The ball is in the U.S. court.” Iran re-closed the Strait of Hormuz in direct response.
Further fault lines in the ceasefire were announced by Iran’s Supreme National Security Council, which stated the U.S. had agreed in principle to lift all primary and secondary sanctions, withdraw combat forces from the region, and maintain Iranian control over the Strait. The U.S. confirmed none of these terms, however, and Vice President JD Vance contended that factions within Iran were “lying about even the fragile truths that we’ve already struck.”
Nuclear disarmament is the existential question as talks kick off, but Hormuz tolling is perhaps the most relevant to domestic U.S. politics. Anything short of a complete reopening would be viewed as a failure. In the meantime, Iran’s parliament approved a bill formalizing transit fees at approximately $1 per barrel—a maximum $2 million charge for a fully loaded supertanker. Iran is now accepting payment in cryptocurrency or Chinese yuan. While this was met by strong Omani rejections, President Trump seemingly endorsed the concept in comments to ABC’s Jonathan Karl: “We’re thinking of doing it as a joint venture.”
One potential pathway towards administering Strait traffic would be the formalization of a joint monitoring protocol between Iran and Oman with shipping companies paying Oman as a sanctions-clean intermediary. Oman and Iran would then settle the revenue split privately. President Trump has already nominated Oman as Washington’s “agent,” thus the rhetoric around a “joint venture.” Expect the tolling structure to be a primary negotiating item at the Islamabad Talks.
Islamabad Talks
Vice President Vance departed Washington on Friday for Islamabad to lead Saturday’s negotiations, accompanied by Special Envoy Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner. Vance called the prospects of the talks “positive,” adding that the Administration was “willing to extend the open hand” but warned Tehran not to “try to play us.” Pakistani Prime Minister Sharif similarly called the talks a “historic occasion” that would “make or break” both sides’ pursuit of a permanent ceasefire.
The Iranian side is led by seasoned Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi and conservative but pragmatic Parliament Speaker Mohammad-Bagher Ghalibaf. The delegation also includes hardliner Ali Bagheri Kani, according to Iran’s state broadcaster IRIB. Bagheri Kani was a staunch critic of the Obama Administration’s 2015 nuclear agreement as the then-nuclear negotiator under hardline Iranian president Ebrahim Raisi. Bagheri Kani also once managed the presidential campaign of Saeed Jalili, the leader of Iran’s most conservative parliamentary faction, and a deputy under former hardline president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
Complicating negotiations from the outset, Iran has expanded its list of demands, insisting that its “blocked assets” be released as a precondition before talks begin—adding to the Lebanon ceasefire and uranium enrichment rights demands Ghalibaf had already set. With the talks now underway, as confirmed by Iranian state media, it is unclear how Iran’s preconditions have been met.
Meanwhile, the Islamabad weekend talks face a parallel negotiating structure in Israel-Lebanon discussions that are currently scheduled for next week in Washington. Israel confirmed it would continue military operations against Hezbollah while participating in those talks. The Israeli military said its air force hit over 200 targets linked to Hezbollah on Saturday. These dueling negotiating frameworks underscore how far apart the parties are and the complexity of interests involved.
The U.S. 15-point demand list includes dismantling all major nuclear facilities, ending all uranium enrichment on Iranian soil, and transferring enriched uranium. Iran’s 10-point counter-proposal calls for continued Iranian control over the Strait of Hormuz, withdrawal of U.S. forces from all regional bases, lifting all primary and secondary sanctions, and compensation for war damages. As Foundation for Defense of Democracies analyst Mark Dubowitz stated, these demands are “planetary distances apart.”
Simultaneously, U.S. forces continue to deploy to the region. President Trump said on Friday that the U.S. was “loading up the ships” with ammunition and weapons should negotiations fall apart. U.S. jet fighters and attack planes recently arrived in the Middle East, per flight-tracking data and a U.S. official. An additional 1,500 to 2,000 troops from the 82nd Airborne Division could also arrive in the coming days. The USS George H.W. Bush carrier strike group departed Virginia at the end of March and is currently in the Atlantic; the USS Boxer and its accompanying warships—carrying the 11th Marine Expeditionary Unit—deployed from California in mid-March and are in the Pacific, likely more than a week from the region. The USS Boxer’s estimated arrival window aligns almost precisely with the two-week ceasefire expiration.
In a significant development reported this morning, two U.S. Navy guided-missile destroyers transited the Strait of Hormuz on Saturday, the first passage of American warships through the waterway since the war began six weeks ago. This is both a positive signal regarding Hormuz (and a sign of Iranian acquiescence) and a reminder of the military hammer the White House continues to wield.
Thus far, the Administration confirms more than 85% of Iran’s defense industrial base destroyed, including the majority of its ballistic missiles, launcher vehicles, and long-range attack drones; Iranian air force sorties reduced from 30-100 per day pre-war to zero; 150 warships across 16 classes destroyed, every submarine sunk, 97% of naval mines eliminated; the regime assessed as no longer capable of manufacturing replacement ballistic missiles and long-range drones for proxy forces; 70% of space launch facilities destroyed or degraded; and more than 2,000 C2 strikes producing leadership losses, paralysis, and desertions. By the numbers: over 10,200 U.S. air sorties, over 13,000 targets struck, over 1,000 incoming drone threats and 700 ballistic missile threats intercepted.
The Pentagon separately awarded Lockheed Martin a $4.7 billion contract for Patriot interceptors—confirming the procurement pipeline is active regardless of ceasefire status—but a reminder that the U.S. war chest will need to be refilled.
Heading into the weekend, the ceasefire’s most consequential and existential variable is Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile. At the outset of operations, the Administration documented approximately 10,000 kilograms of enriched uranium. Importantly, none of the existing Iranian uranium is at weapons-grade 90%, but it is enough to put Tehran within reach of restarting military nuclear aspirations if accessed.
The analytically relevant subset is a smaller stockpile estimated at approximately 450 kilograms of higher-enriched material, believed to be stored at Pickaxe Mountain near Natanz. This is a deep, fortified facility that both the U.S. and Israel refrained from striking during the war, likely because existing conventional weapons were judged insufficient.
Secretary of War Pete Hegseth stated confidently on Wednesday that Iran will “either give it to us voluntarily… or if we have to do something else ourselves, like we did with Midnight Hammer last June, we reserve that opportunity.” Trump’s midnight post added: the U.S. would work with Iran to “dig up and remove all of the deeply buried Nuclear ‘Dust’” at Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan. Israel has warned it will renew direct attacks on Iran if the uranium is not turned over. The trilemma facing negotiators today is therefore a U.S. demand for transfer, combined with Iran’s insistence that the ceasefire is silent on enrichment and Israel’s threats to resume bombing if the stash is not surrendered.
Congressional Outlook
In a move that has been widely covered, President Trump posted on Truth Social Tuesday morning that: “A whole civilization will die tonight, never to be brought back again. I don’t want that to happen, but it probably will.” The post triggered the broadest cross-ideological reaction against a sitting president on a single issue in modern political memory.
Tucker Carlson delivered a 43-minute monologue calling the rhetoric “a war crime, a moral crime.” Alex Jones called Trump a “dementia risk.” Marjorie Taylor Greene posted “25TH AMENDMENT!!! Not a single bomb has dropped on America. We cannot kill an entire civilization. This is evil and madness.” Candace Owens called Trump a “genocidal lunatic.”
Hardly allies of the Left, these far-right commentators ironically aligned with more than 85 Democratic lawmakers who similarly called for Trump’s removal via the 25th Amendment or impeachment. In the middle, Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) said the President’s post “is an affront to the ideals our nation has sought to uphold for nearly 250 years.” Even those in the President’s orbit expressed dismay, with conservative Senator Ron Johnson (R-WI) saying, “I do not want to see us start blowing up civilian infrastructure. We are not at war with the Iranian people.”
All of this should be taken with a grain of salt. The 25th Amendment will not be invoked. What is possibly in play, however, is the applicability of the Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act of 2015. Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) has publicly called for congressional review of any potential peace deal with Iran, citing INARA’s statutory mechanism. Congressional aides from both parties confirmed the law could apply if an explicit nuclear component is present in any eventual agreement—which both the U.S. 15-point framework and Iran’s 10-point counter-proposal include.
Under INARA, any lawmaker can force a vote on a joint resolution of disapproval requiring a simple majority in the House and 60 votes for cloture in the Senate. Trump could veto the resolution, of course, requiring Congress to override with a two-thirds majority (unlikely). The Obama-era disapproval vote fell short of 60 despite Democratic defections. Then-Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) was an original INARA co-sponsor in 2015.
The enrichment question is the binding Republican constraint. GOP members have publicly committed to a position that no deal can allow enrichment. A senior congressional Republican aide stated flatly: “If the agreement allows enrichment, it will be very difficult for Republicans to vote for it.”
Democrats, meanwhile, will continue to pursue a successful vote on the war’s authorization. During a pro forma House session Friday, a group of eight House Democrats attempted to force a vote on a War Powers resolution but were denied recognition. Rep. Madeleine Dean (D-PA) stated: “Article 1, Section 8: It is Congress who can declare war. It is not a self-serving president who is guided by Mr. Netanyahu for his own purposes.” The group plans to introduce the resolution next week when the House returns to legislative session.
The last War Powers resolution failed 212-219, but the vote count is shifting. Rep. Henry Cuellar (D-TX), one of the four Democrats who voted against, said Tuesday he will support the next resolution. Rep. Greg Landsman (D-OH) announced last month he would also flip. On the Republican side, Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC) told Axios she would “most likely” support a war powers resolution. GOP Reps. Warren Davidson (R-OH) and Thomas Massie (R-KY) previously joined the majority of Democrats on the first March attempt and are expected to continue their support. Thus, the gap is narrowing—three confirmed flips plus Mace’s likely support closes most of the previous seven vote margin.
The political significance of Congress, however, lies elsewhere. The Administration is expected to seek as much as $200 billion from Congress for the war in a supplemental that has not yet been formally transmitted. Former Pentagon budget official Elaine McCusker assessed the war has cost between $25 billion and $35 billion to date—a burn rate of roughly $4-6 billion per week. Congress has failed to authorize the war, fund it, or stop it. Thus, the war supplemental will be Congress’s most significant leverage with the White House.
Shipping
In the first 24 hours after the ceasefire took effect, Iran permitted 15-20 vessels to transit Hormuz. Windward recorded 20 transits—14 outbound, 6 inbound. The first confirmed crossings were the Greek-owned bulk carrier NJ Earth at 08:44 UTC and the Liberia-flagged Daytona Beach at 06:59 UTC after departing Bandar Abbas.
But more than 800 vessels remain trapped in the Persian Gulf and transits are being negotiated on a ship-by-ship basis via the IRGC, a cumbersome process that will not relieve the existing chokepoint in the near-term. Lloyd’s List editor Richard Meade warned of short-circuiting the bureaucracy, noting that there would be a heightened navigational hazard risk if too many ships attempt transit simultaneously.
These logistical headaches, however, remain theory with Iran re-closing Hormuz on Wednesday in response to Israeli Lebanon strikes. For now, the tolling and transit architecture—whether a “joint venture” or not—is conditional on Lebanon ceasefire compliance, not independent of it. National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett told Fox Business that Hormuz traffic is still running at about 10% of normal pace, despite the reclosure. Hassett estimated full reopening at “two months.”
On the policy front, the U.S. doubled its shipping reinsurance commitment to $40 billion to address the commercial insurance gap impeding transit.
Oil Shock
The ceasefire announcement triggered the largest single-day crude oil decline since the onset of Covid and the opening of Desert Storm. WTI fell more than 16% to approximately $94.25; Brent fell in parallel to approximately $94.22—temporarily closing the structural WTI-over-Brent benchmark inversion that had opened last week.
The two benchmarks finished the week with WTI again elevated vis-à-vis Brent, signaling a prolonged-conflict premium. Brent began the year at $61, peaked at $118 at Q1’s close per the EIA, and settled Friday at $96.75 (54% above year-start). WTI closed at $98.46 on Friday, briefly crossing $100 intraday before pulling back. Both benchmarks remain down roughly 10–12% on the week, with six weeks of physical infrastructure damage, 800 stranded vessels, a contested tolling regime, and Hormuz running at 10% of normal traffic between the oil price and full normalization.
The Russia windfall remains a principal beneficiary of the war and a sore point with Congress and the EU. Russian Urals crude reached $116.05 per barrel on April 2, its highest in more than 13 years. The inflow nearly doubles Russia’s $59 federal budget assumption, materially strengthening Kremlin finances as it continues its campaign in Ukraine.
NATO
President Trump’s White House meeting with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte on Wednesday ran nearly two and a half hours under a media blackout. Rutte later told CNN’s Jake Tapper he had tried to convince Trump that “the vast majority” of European allies had been supportive on Iran. According to Rutte, “It was a very frank, a very open discussion. He clearly told me what he thought of what happened over the last couple of weeks.”
Press Secretary Leavitt said before the meeting she expected Trump to raise the prospect of leaving NATO. Tapper pressed Rutte twice on that question but Rutte sidestepped with his answer both times. In a sign that Rutte’s assurances had landed flat, Trump was back on Truth Social after the meeting criticizing NATO.
The gap between the meeting’s takeaways tells a recurring story. While short of an outright exit from the alliance, The Wall Street Journal reported the Administration is considering redeploying U.S. troops away from NATO countries deemed unhelpful, a move that would avoid congressional approval. Bloomberg reported the Administration formally requested detailed NATO plans for Hormuz support within a matter of days. If the 40-nation coalition—which has been planning the post-combat de-mining and policing operation for two weeks—delivers that architecture quickly, Rutte has a path back into Trump’s good graces and NATO has a concrete operational contribution to demonstrate.
Economic Outlook
The ceasefire market reaction was the week’s economic headline. The S&P 500 gained 2.54%; the Dow 2.66%; the Nasdaq 3.13%. The VIX fell nearly 20%. The dollar index fell more than 1%, erasing its year-to-date gain. Bitcoin topped $71,000. The MSCI Emerging Markets index posted its best single day since 2022, rising more than 5%, led by oil-importing nations South Korea and Taiwan.
Fed rate cut expectations revived as crude fell back below $95. The WSJ noted that U.S. stocks “roared back” for the week, with the S&P 500 posting its best weekly gain since November at 3.68%, the Dow up 3.61%, the Nasdaq up 4.31%, and the Russell 2000 up 4.20%—all buoyed by the ceasefire announcement even as the underlying economic data remained sobering. That relief rally deserves scrutiny against the week’s data.
The March CPI—the first inflation read covering the initial weeks of the Iran war—showed headline inflation at 3.3% year-over-year, the hottest reading of the second Trump Administration, with a monthly increase of 0.9%. The driver was energy: overall energy costs rose nearly 11%; gasoline surged more than 21% month-over-month. The national average gas price is $4.15 per gallon, with California materially higher—Los Angeles at $5.95 per gallon for regular-grade.
Core CPI (excluding food and energy) rose 2.6%, suggesting the war’s price impact has not yet broadly transmitted into services and shelter. Used car prices fell approximately 3%; medical and personal care costs also declined. Hassett’s two-month normalization estimate for Hormuz traffic means elevated gas prices and their downstream effects on food, airfares, and oil-reliant industries are sticky through the summer travel season regardless of ceasefire status.
The February PCE reinforced the same picture. Headline PCE held at 2.8% year-over-year; core PCE eased to 3.0% from January’s 3.1%—still materially above the Fed’s 2% target. Monthly PCE accelerated to +0.4% while personal incomes fell 0.1%—a miss against consensus expectations of a gain more in line with January’s +0.4%. Consumer spending grew 0.5%, possibly boosted by OBBBA-related returns. The Q4 2025 GDP third estimate was revised down to 0.5% annualized from the prior 0.7%—meaning the economy entered the Iran war barely growing. The Q1 2026 GDP read releases April 30.
University of Michigan (UM) preliminary consumer sentiment for April fell 11% from March, with director Joanne Hsu noting: “Demographic groups across age, income, and political party all posted setbacks in sentiment, as did every component of the index, reflecting the widespread nature of this month’s fall.” The vast majority of responses were collected before the April 7 ceasefire announcement. The final April read at month-end will be the first measure of whether the ceasefire provided durable relief.
The structural picture beneath the relief rally warrants more caution. Bloomberg Opinion’s Kathryn Anne Edwards published a piece this week arguing the more accurate historical parallel is the early 2000s, not the 1970s. The 1970s stagflation comparison—which Powell pushed back on at the March FOMC—would require high unemployment, high inflation, and wage-price spiral dynamics simultaneously. The early 2000s featured instead a jobless recovery, weak labor force participation, and an oil shock absorbed without a wage-price spiral because workers lacked bargaining power to transmit energy costs into wages. Core CPI at 2.6% supports that frame. The 3.3% headline and 0.9% monthly print are what consumers see at the gas station, and the UM cross-demographic breadth signals consumer psychology may not wait for the economists’ distinction.
Labor force participation fell to 61.9% in March—its lowest level since 1977 outside the pandemic. Economists attribute the decline to demographic aging and the Trump Administration’s immigration crackdown cutting population growth. WSJ’s Matt Grossman reported that forecasters have missed all three jobs projections so far in 2026. UBS economist Jonathan Pingle: “I don’t think forecasting the headline labor market numbers has been this challenging at any point of my career.” The April read, due May 8, is the first genuine post-war labor market print—arriving in a forecasting environment where consensus estimates carry less signal than usual.
With Fed decision-making in the balance, the previously scheduled April 16 confirmation hearing of Kevin Warsh to be the next Fed Chair was delayed. Punchbowl reports the Senate Banking Committee has not yet received Warsh’s required disclosure paperwork, leading to the delay. Jay Powell’s term expires May 15, but it is increasingly likely that he will be serving in a holdover capacity beyond his term’s expiration. With the Tillis blockade undeterred, the installation of Todd Blanche as acting Attorney General brings into question whether the Department of Justice (DOJ) will accelerate or shelve its Powell investigation. Tangentially relevant, POLITICO reports that Chris Phelan, an adviser at the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, is the frontrunner to lead the Council of Economic Advisers (CEA), replacing Stephen Miran who stepped down in February to join the Fed.
TRADE UPDATE
China
Beijing’s role in brokering the Iran ceasefire is the most consequential recent development for President Trump’s scheduled Beijing summit with President Xi Jinping. Trump confirmed China helped convince Tehran to deescalate, as did the White House, stating that interaction had occurred at the “top levels” of both governments. Iranian officials, as well, credited a last-minute Chinese intervention in which the CCP asked Iran “to show flexibility and defuse tensions.” China’s Foreign Ministry also acknowledged its “own efforts” without confirming the specifics.
Iran has publicly asked Beijing to serve as a security guarantor in any permanent agreement—a request analysts say China is unlikely to accept but will be noteworthy heading into the Beijing summit. Indeed, the ceasefire credit gives Beijing fresh diplomatic capital for the May summit, particularly on its role in reopening the Strait.
Two Chinese state-owned oil tankers traversed the Strait Saturday morning, according to ship tracker MarineTraffic, the most visible sign yet of China’s relationship with Iran’s Hormuz access decisions. The two vessels—Cospearl Lake and He Rong Hai—had been waiting at the entrance of the Strait for over a week, carrying crude from Iraq and Saudi Arabia. President Trump thus will arrive in Beijing likely needing continued Chinese cooperation on Iran and supply of rare earths.
Against this backdrop, Beijing issued its most aggressive supply chain coercion regulations to date. On April 7, the State Council codified China’s authority to levy fines and restrict exports, imports, and investment for any entity deemed to “interrupt normal transactions or take discriminatory measures” damaging Chinese industrial supply chains. The measures expand Beijing’s range of targets to any link in a supply chain “established or operated by” foreign entity—meaning a U.S. company reshoring semiconductors or rare earths could face Chinese sanctions, exit bans, or export restrictions regardless of where in the chain the activity occurs.
Wang Minghui of China’s top development authority described the regulations as “of milestone significance… a key step for China to proactively manage its international room to maneuver” against U.S.-led decoupling. The regulations apply the same coercive logic Beijing has used to weaponize rare earth leverage across all critical industries.
Meanwhile, USTR Ambassador Jamieson Greer offered the U.S. objectives heading into the summit as twofold: a stable relationship and continued U.S. access to Chinese rare earth elements—both elements of a potential bilateral Board of Trade. On the stability front, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller are reportedly enforcing an internal directive against disrupting the China relationship ahead of the President’s visit. It remains to be seen, however, how this directive comports with impending Taiwan weapons sales, inbound Chinese investment desires, and ongoing congressional pressure. In summary:
- Ambassador Greer confirmed at a Stellantis plant tour that Chinese vehicles will not be allowed in the U.S. market for the foreseeable future due to connected vehicle technology restrictions taking effect over the next 12 to 18 months.
- Two successive Senate delegations visited Taiwan in deliberate pre-summit signaling. Sen. Jim Banks (R-IN)—a chip export hawk close to the President—arrived in Taipei and met President Lai Ching-te, the vice president, defense minister, and legislative speaker. “A strong U.S.-Taiwan partnership is key if we want to stay ahead of Communist China,” Banks told Punchbowl.
- Separately, a bipartisan CODEL—Senators John Curtis (R-UT), Jacky Rosen (D-NV), Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH), and Thom Tillis (R-NC)—completed a multi-country swing through Taiwan, Japan, and South Korea the prior week.
- The House Select Committee on China highlighted the Department of War’s new research security prohibition barring Pentagon-funded research collaboration with restricted entities—a “long-sought reform” per Chairman John Moolenaar (R-MI), who plans to push for statutory codification.
- House Energy and Commerce Chairman Brett Guthrie (R-KY) aims to keep congressional pressure elevated, as well, announcing an April 15 hearing on “Computing Power and Competition: Examining the Semiconductor Ecosystem.”
Donroe Doctrine
Rep. Mario Díaz-Balart (R-FL), a senior House Appropriations Committee member, pushed back Tuesday on any suggestion the Administration would make concessions to Cuba: “The regime should understand that this administration is not playing games.” Díaz-Balart confirmed Trump will not make concessions to Havana. The remarks represent the hard-line track running parallel to the humanitarian energy carve-out that allowed the Russian tanker Anatoly Kolodkin to deliver 730,000 barrels to Matanzas last week with Kremlin-confirmed Washington coordination. Both tracks are Administration policy simultaneously.
Farther south, Bloomberg reports ConocoPhillips has sent a team to Venezuela to evaluate oil prospects—a material escalation from CEO Ryan Lance’s February posture, when he said the firm’s priority remained recovering approximately $10 billion in arbitration awards before committing new capital. The deployment signals ConocoPhillips has determined the political and legal framework has shifted enough to justify assessment costs following the U.S. Embassy’s formal reopening in Caracas last week. Venezuela holds the world’s largest proven oil reserves; any production recovery requires years of capital-intensive investment, but the first-mover evaluation is now underway.
Those Latin American countries already aligned with the Administration continue to expand their growing partnerships. Ecuadorian President Daniel Noboa told Bloomberg this week he would welcome U.S. troops to help address his country’s “security crisis,” as long as they follow the lead of local armed forces. “It’s not an invasion, it’s not an intruder coming into our country,” Noboa said from Guayaquil. “It’s actually international collaboration against crime.”
The U.S. has already helped Ecuador target criminal gangs with advanced tracking and intelligence technology, and American commandos have joined Ecuadorian troops in joint ground operations. Government data show a nearly 35% year-on-year decline in violent crime in border conflict zones in Q1 2026.
Noboa’s statement carries a political complication for both his own country and other Latin nations. Ecuadorian voters rejected a constitutional reform allowing foreign military bases in a November 2025 referendum he promoted. The current U.S. military presence operates under cooperation agreements and temporary mission frameworks that avoid a formal basing arrangement. But more broadly, the military partnership with Ecuador brings questions and potential pressure upon Mexico’s posture towards U.S. military incursions. President Claudia Sheinbaum, while still enjoying widespread popular support, must navigate U.S. security demands with strong domestic political sensitivities around sovereignty. Security will be a headline problem for the Sheinbaum government as the World Cup kicks off and the USMCA’s July 1 Joint Review approaches.
USMCA
USTR Greer publicly acknowledged at a Hudson Institute event early this past week that the U.S. will not resolve all outstanding issues with Canada and Mexico by the July 1 Joint Review deadline. “We aren’t probably going to be able to resolve all issues by July 1. But I think we are on track to resolve many of them.”
Greer also confirmed the Administration’s baseline: “Almost everyone suggested changes to the agreement. So that’s our baseline, is that things have to be changed.” He further noted that more progress has been made with Mexico than Canada and that unresolved concerns with the latter remain.
This is the first senior Administration official to publicly acknowledge partial resolution as an acceptable near-term working outcome—a meaningful signal to markets and companies that USMCA will—in all likelihood—survive even if it enters the 10-year renegotiation window.
Meanwhile, Canadian Prime Minister Carney is on the verge of a parliamentary majority after a fifth Conservative defection to the Liberals. Marilyn Gladu of Ontario crossed the floor citing a desire for “a more constructive, collaborative approach.” Carney’s Liberals are now within one seat of a majority, with three special elections scheduled Monday where they are strongly favored to win at least two.
A Carney majority changes the Canadian negotiating posture materially: a minority government negotiates with one eye on a confidence vote; a majority government can take positions and hold them. For the July 1 deadline, a majority-supported Carney has more political cover to make concessions and more stability to resist U.S. pressure.
Tariffs
This week, Trump posted a threat of 50% tariffs on any country supplying weapons to Iran. NEC Director Hassett said the Administration would look to IEEPA to implement it—the same authority the Supreme Court just ruled cannot be used for tariffs. While the legal mechanism cited by Hassett is all but unavailable to the President, the political threat is real and can likely be achieved through other means (e.g., the Smoot Hawley Act has also been floated as an avenue).
The 50% threat also creates a China problem as any weapons-supplier tariff necessarily implicates China’s documented arms transfers to Iran. Should the tariff threat move forward in some fashion, the Bessent/Miller summit-management directive would be challenged. Beijing, having just helped deliver the Iranian ceasefire, will likely also be needed to help secure the reopening of the Hormuz Strait.
Further developments this week on the tariff front included the disclosure of aluminum companies raising premiums in response to Iranian war supply disruptions, a prospect that is leading downstream industries to become more vocal with the Administration. The Court on International Trade (CIT) also announced that it will hear arguments this Saturday on the Section 122 tariff challenge; the government argues the court cannot review the balance of payments finding underlying Section 122’s authority.
Miscellaneous
- European Union. Ambassador Greer flagged European digital services taxes as a “fragile issue” and rejected the European ambassadors’ argument that their DSTs are non-discriminatory. “We’re not fooled by any of that,” he said, noting pressure to open a Section 301 investigation. European Commissioner Magnus Brunner countered at the HumanX conference in San Francisco that the EU’s AI Act, Digital Services Act, and Digital Markets Act offer regulatory certainty across all 27 member states that the U.S. patchwork approach cannot match. EU Trade Commissioner Maros Sefcovic will visit Washington April 23-24 as inter-institutional EU-U.S. deal negotiations begin at the European Parliament next week. Some member states view the Parliament’s “sunset clause” as destabilizing and Greer warned additional “conditions” could trigger U.S. conditions in return. Greer is scheduled to testify before the House Ways and Means Committee in April.
- Hungary. Vice President Vance’s Budapest visit produced the most substantive U.S.-Hungary bilateral package since the alliance’s post-Cold War founding. Among the details: $500 million in U.S. crude purchases by MOL Group; a front-end engineering and design study for up to 10 U.S. SMRs (potential $20 billion commitment) with MOUs from GE Vernova, Holtec, and Westinghouse; Westinghouse MOU to extend Paks 1 and displace Rosatom’s Paks 2 role; $700 million in HIMARS procurement; a Northrop Grumman/4iG geosynchronous satellite program; Microsoft Sovereign Cloud and AI training MOUs; and a GE Healthcare/Semmelweis University oncology center. The package was meant to anchor Prime Minister Viktor Orbán’s domestic position ahead of this Sunday’s parliamentary elections, though the WSJ reports Orbán’s re-election prospects are fading amid a surging opposition. Secondly, the deal is perhaps the most aggressive U.S. counter-move to date against Russian energy dominance in Central Europe and a positive NATO signal despite the media’s noise.
- India. The Indian government announced a U.S.-India Trade Facilitation Portal, consistent with the Greer-Goyal WTO Ministerial discussions on advancing the reciprocal trade framework to the agreement phase.
- Singapore. Trade Minister Gan Siow Huang confirmed the U.S. removed an “inaccurate statement” on Singapore’s trade surplus from the Section 301 excess capacity investigation.
OUTLOOK/ANALYSIS
The ceasefire is the most consequential development in our note’s coverage of Operation Epic Fury. It is also the most ambiguous. The deal was assembled in hours, announced without a written text, and immediately contested by three of its four principal parties. The Lebanon fault line is the likeliest near-term mechanism of failure, though growing disagreements over frozen assets, enriched uranium, proxies, and governance of Hormuz will all be on the table this weekend—each one could individually upend the talks.
The nuclear dimension is the ceasefire’s deepest structural fault line. The most likely outcome of the Islamabad Talks on enrichment is not resolution but managed ambiguity: a surveillance-based structure in which the U.S. monitors known enrichment sites and reserves the right to strike, while Iran neither surrenders nor openly advances its program.
The INARA mechanism means any agreement with a nuclear component could face a congressional review process. The inklings of congressional input are now coming to the forefront—INARA and approval of a needed war funding supplemental.
The Islamabad Talks bring all of the above into view simultaneously. Meanwhile, the Hormuz situation is pressing on the economic data—confirming that the equity rally prices an outcome that the facts do not support. CPI at 3.3% and core PCE at 3.0% are the better indicators, both of which showed up in UM’s sentiment falling 11% across all demographics.
The China dimension closes the week’s analysis with an important asymmetry. Beijing helped deliver the ceasefire yet U.S. officials have alleged that China continues to supply elements of Iran’s military. Stability is thus at risk heading into the May summit, with both sides quietly continuing elements of their provocations.
China arrives at the May summit with ceasefire credit, demonstrated leverage over Tehran (and potentially the Strait), and new coercive tools. The U.S. arrives needing Chinese cooperation on oversight of a potential Iran agreement and continued rare earth access. The Islamabad Talks today and tomorrow will reveal whether Beijing’s leverage comes with a price tag. The USS Boxer and its Marine Expeditionary Unit will reveal what happens if the talks fall apart.
###